Right to protection but not to senseless carnage

Child, no one is attempting to deprive you of your lollipop. It’s the lollipop-pop-pop-pop-pop, that fair-minded, decent people are addressing.

Son, there is a difference between a gun and an automatic weapon with high-capacity magazines and, let’s say, a bazooka. Can you see that?

President Barack Obama never ever implied or indicated an attack on the Second Amendment. On the contrary, he has a deep respect, as I do, for the Founding Fathers’ masterpiece, the Constitution.

Ronald Reagan stated, “I do not believe in taking away the right of the citizen for sporting, for hunting, and so forth, or for home defense. But I do believe that an AK-47, a machine gun, is not a sporting weapon, and is not needed for home defense.”

I will add: What a lousy shot one must be if such a weapon is needful.

Young man, stop shouting, “The British are coming!” to claim we have a tyrannical government after our leader was duly elected with both the popular vote and the electoral vote

Radical indoctrinated, it’s time to unite unless chaos is your target, automatically.

Ignorance and hate never rest it seems.

Why don’t we have roots instead of feet, since so many of us are fixed, programmed and brainwashed from cradle to grave, like miserable weeds in one spot (ideology), that we can’t leave, simply because we lack the conscience, character and courage?

To senseless carnage – no. To right of protection – yes.

Alain Mei