×

Good reason to question 9/11 Commission Report

I am responding to the two editorials by your publisher, the first (Sept. 10) giving credence to the official story of the 9/11 attacks, and the second (Sept. 17) bashing a very credible letter (Sept. 13) by a reader who debunked the official version of the 9/11 story.

Here are just a few good reasons to question that official version given in the 9/11 Commission Report: The fall of the third World Trade Center building on Sept. 11, 2001, Building 7, headquarters of the N.Y. mayor, collapsed in seconds into its own footprint at around 5 p.m., not even mentioned in the commission’s report. Nowhere else have fires caused collapse of steel and concrete high rises.

Various police and firefighters on the scene reported explosions in the towers before they fell. Melted steel was still pooled in the basements of the two towers two weeks after 9/11. Thermite was found in samples recovered from metal pieces that were whisked away from the site. In news photos of the Pentagon, there were no wing fragments nor imprint of a plane’s wings at the round hole where it’s more likely a missile entered.

Over 2,900 architects and engineers and many 9/11 families have called for a new and independent investigation.

Read research reports at Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth). “The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11” by David Ray Griffin is another good source of information.

Mele Stokesberry

Kula

NEWSLETTER

Today's breaking news and more in your inbox

I'm interested in (please check all that apply)
Are you a paying subscriber to the newspaper?
     
Support Local Journalism on Maui

Only $99/year

Subscribe Today