Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Vac Rental | E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 

Gun nuts in Congress

November 10, 2013 - Harry Eagar
How it used to be:

"Congress in those days (the decades before the Civil War) could have easily been mistaken for a Western saloon. 'Every man on the floor of both Houses is armed with a revolver,' reported Senator James Hammond of South Carolina, 'and some with two revolvers and a Bowie knife.' Senator Benjamin Wade of Ohio even carried a sawed-off shotgun. When a pistol concealed in one House member's desk accidentally discharged, there were instantly 'fully thirty or forty pistols in the air, recalled Representative William Holman of Indiana, who was present." (from Michael Farquhar, "A Treasury of Great American Scandals")

This gives a different coloration to Webster's "Reply to Hayne," which schoolboys of 7 or 8 generations ago (in the North) used to memorize.

Despite all the artillery, nobody got shot on the floor of Congress until 1954 when Puerto Rican nationalists shot 5.

 
 

Article Comments

(5)

OneAikea

Nov-11-13 11:20 PM

Gettysburg. Republicans on one side and Democrats on the other. Civil War never ended. No assault weapons, just single fire muskets.

HarryEagar

Nov-11-13 2:16 PM

I wondered how closely this post would be read. Not too closely, evidently, since one reading of that quotation would be an endorsement of the theory that if everybody is carrying, then people will hesitate to start shooting.

That theory is bogus, as the shootout at the Texas party this weekend (and many other shootings) demonstrates, but there was nothing in the original post to show that.

It's true that the congresscritters never shot each other on the floor of Congress, but that doesn't mean they didn't shoot each other. They used to go to the Bladensburg duelling grounds to do that.

The quotation is also interesting in showing that despite the rancor in Congress today, it used to be very much worse; also that, on the whole, Americans have gotten less violent over time.

OneAikea

Nov-11-13 12:31 AM

With the unlimited access to alcohol, you don't need Golytely, johngault. With rationing coming you may have to go back to Golytely or go cold, Turkey.

Drone on dreck. The next drone may be flying over you car tailing a drunk driver. DUI johngault or his doppess on Honoapiilani. Neither one lives on Maui.

OneAikea

Nov-11-13 12:25 AM

"Naw"? Sounds like a conservative on moonshine. Yah Ahll drive safe now you heah. Naw! Must be rich to give out unlimited access to alcohol but too cheap with two cent comments. I don't worry about my odds against a packing right winger nor a slobbering drunk on Honoapiilani. Wikileak tells about the dreck brothers. I never worry about one without breath nor a wise cracker.

Party on dreck. One day a right winger might be driving sober but still cause an accident on Honoapiilani. Learn the meaning of Divine Punishment.

johngault

Nov-10-13 11:06 PM

Naw, Dude. We give unlimited access to alcohol to about everyone, and then their cars. Why don't you drone on about the numbers of those maimed or killed by drunks. How about the stats on what out of control drinkers do every day. Your odds are better with a packing right winger than a slobbering drunk on Honoapiilani.

Party on dude, but stay sober and stay healthy because the rationing is coming.

 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or
 
 
 

 

I am looking for:
in:
News, Blogs & Events Web
 
 

Blog Photos

Webster delivering the Reply to Hayne

 
 
 
 

Blog Links