County cap for waterline repayment in pipeline
Lee seeks to increase limits from original proposal
KULA — The tension over whether the county or the homeowner should foot the bulk of the bill for waterline improvements, especially in Upcountry agricultural areas with no or outdated county infrastructure, continues as two bills are being hashed out in a council committee.
Council Member Alice Lee, chairwoman of the council Water and Infrastructure Committee, is gathering public input as she revises proposals that apply to waterline and existing street work required for homeowners to subdivide.
Emphasizing that the proposals are workable, Lee, along with Wendy Taomoto, county Department of Water Supply engineering program manager, and Helene Kau, water department deputy director, outlined the measures and answered questions at a Kula Community Association meeting Wednesday night.
About 70 people attended, some of whom testified they are already drowning in the high costs of obtaining county water meters due to expensive County Code requirements.
Bill 46 would put a cap on county reimbursements to homeowners for water main extensions. The improvements are needed if water infrastructure is not available for a proposed or existing subdivision; the applicant for the subdivision pays for work to extend a water main from the nearest pipeline.
Lee is proposing a $250,000 reimbursement cap while providing a consistent 75 percent reimbursement rate for water main extensions with the applicant given five years to complete the subdivision water system improvements. The proposed bill is meant to “state conditions under which subdivision water main extension reimbursements shall be made and to control the county’s reimbursement costs.”
Dating back to 2017, the original proposal by then-Water Supply Director Dave Taylor was a $25,000 reimbursement cap for regular subdivisions and a $35,000 cap for family subdivisions. Last year following council meetings, the proposed reimbursement cap was increased to $100,000.
Currently, the County Code has no dollar limits for reimbursements and has no defined revenue stream to offset possible expenses.
“The need for a cap stems from a desire to control costs on our end to provide us a better avenue which we can budget what we can anticipate in terms of what those reimbursement costs would be,” Kau said at the meeting. “And so if we limit the reimbursement that provides us a better vehicle for budgeting purposes.”
The old ordinance allowed people to have “open-ended contracts” with the county, Lee added.
“We have to be responsible and accountable with our funding,” she said. “We can’t have people owing 20, 30, 40 thousand without any kind of closure or end to the contract.”
On average, people were being reimbursed under $100,000, according to Lee. A few people were caught in a situation where their costs were “well above the $100,000 mark,” she said.
Taomoto said there are only a few instances where a subdivision applicant has paid more than the $250,000 maximum. “Those instances are not very common,” she said.
Kula resident Sherman “Dudley” DePonte told The Maui News last year that he was facing at least $3 million in required improvements for his family subdivision.
He testified about the continuing water meter challenges Upcountry on Wednesday night.
“The idea is we’re all stuck to that (proposed reimbursement) limit,” he said. “Some of us will be able to work with that; some of us won’t.”
Though the rules apply to residents seeking a subdivision countywide, waterline improvement challenges are seen mostly Upcountry due to its agricultural history, Lee said. Also, families that own many acres often look to subdivide for relatives.
Taomoto said the department sees two kinds of meter applications — for an upgrade in domestic service and to subdivide. Meter upgrade requests have lesser requirements. For subdivisions, though, fire protection, along with other mandates in the subdivision section of the water code, can rack up the bill.
In a Maui News report last year, department records showed that since 2009, county reimbursements to homeowners totaled just more $1.2 million (which includes reimbursements promised in recent years that are still being repaid). The lowest reimbursement was $17,850, paid over a four-year period from 2011 to 2015. The largest reimbursement was $363,170, which was paid out from 2010 to 2014.
A second proposed bill would amend a current exemption that relates to improvements required on existing streets for those subdividing their properties.
It would require improvements to existing streets for a subdivision creating two developable lots, except for an applicant on the priority list for the Upcountry water system who qualifies for the exemption from fire protection mainline infrastructure improvements under a section of the County Code.
Lee said the amendment corrects a mistake made when the rule was passed in 2015. It was meant to exempt people on the Upcountry water meter list but instead the whole county got exempted.
“There’s no way the county can afford that — it’s impossible,” she said. “This particular ordinance was a mistake. Some people feel very upset about it because we are trying to change it back, but it’s the truth, and we are hoping all of you will understand that.”
* Kehaulani Cerizo can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.