Living and working in Ha‘ikū, Hawai‘i, I understand how policy decisions made thousands of miles away can have outsized effects on local communities.

That is why the hemp ban quietly added to a federal funding bill is so concerning. Changes with consequences this serious should not be made without transparency, especially for states like Hawai‘i, where access and supply chains already come with unique challenges.

Hemp-derived products play a role in many people’s daily lives across the islands, including small business owners, veterans, seniors, and individuals seeking alternatives for pain management and wellness. When regulated products are removed from the market, demand does not disappear. Instead, access becomes more limited, oversight weakens, and consumers are pushed toward unregulated options that lack consistent standards.

Hawai‘i businesses have worked to operate responsibly within the law. The hemp industry has repeatedly supported clear guardrails, including age restrictions, testing requirements, accurate labeling, and safe packaging. These measures protect consumers and create accountability. Sudden prohibition undermines these protections and destabilizes businesses that have followed the rules.

The Baird-Craig extension offers a more responsible approach. A 24-month extension in addition to the current 12-month sunset period would give lawmakers the time needed to develop clear, enforceable regulations without disrupting lawful access or local livelihoods.

Urge Rep. Jill Tokuda and Sens. Mazie Hirono and Brian Schatz to support this extension and ensure Hawai‘i’s communities are not overlooked in the process.

Good policy should be deliberate and informed, not rushed.

Gina Epifano
Ha‘ikū